I have never used beta or any
such silly measures to evaluate risk and as an individual investor could not
care less for an academic definition of risk.
In my view risk is
multifaceted, fuzzy and grey and it cannot be boiled down to a single number.
It is not even possible to minimize all forms of risk at the same time – for
example you can minimize the risk of a quotational loss on your portfolio by
increasing the cash component, but that increases the risk of missing out on the
gains if the market moves upwards.
In a set of posts, i am going
to list some of the risks which come to my mind. I will try to explain these
risks and give some example too. In the end, I will share a framework which I
use to think and make investment decisions. As always, if you are expecting a magic formulae
at the end, you will be disappointed.
I am going to break down an
investor’s risk in two sections – Risks faced by investor independent of the
company/ stock and the business related risks of a specific investment. This
post will cover the risks faced by all investors, irrespective of the type of
investments.
Stage of life/ Age risk
This is a widely understood
form of risk – As one grows older and approaches retirement, the capacity to
bear risk reduces. As a 25 year old, one can afford to lose a large portion of
one’s portfolio and can still recover from it as one has a long working life
ahead. I personally managed to lose almost 25% of my portfolio in my 20s and
although it hurt emotionally, it did not make much of a dent on my long term
networth.
I personal think that all
kinds of experimentation and trial and error should be done by an investor as early
in their working life as possible. However once you cross late 30s or 40s, it
is important to focus on risk reduction and avoid losing a large portion of
your portfolio (small losses are however inevitable in equity investing)
The duration / cash flow needsThis is usually but not always related to the age of an investor. A younger investor can afford to take a very long term view of his or her investments and think in terms of multiple decades. An investor in his or her late 50s however has several cash flow needs on the horizon such as education for children and hence needs to design the portfolio accordingly. As a result, any capital which is needed in the next 5 years, should not be invested in equities. If you do so, you are exposing yourself to the risk that the market would drop at the time when this invested cash is needed, turning a temporary loss to a permanent one.
The interesting point is that
this advantage is usually wasted by the younger investors. I have rarely seen
investor in their 20s who are patient and long term oriented. At this stage in
life, one usually feels invincible and smart. On top of that if you have
graduated from some of the top colleges in the country, you close to 100% sure
that you will beat the market in your sleep.
A majority of such over
confident guys (and they are mostly guys) get their back side kicked and blame
everyone else for their failure. A few however are sensible enough to realize
their stupidity and work to fix it over time.
Emotional/ Attitude risk
This is a rarely
discussed risk. Let me explain what I mean by this – One can call this
temperament or maturity. There are some people who have temperamentally more
suited to the stock market as they are calm, humble and eager to learn. In
addition these people do not get swept by greed or fear. As a result such
people are able to do fairly well over the long term.
On the other hand, you will
often find people who are eager to invest in equities but are impatient and
bring a level of arrogance to the stock market. They seem to believe that the
stock market owes them high returns. As a result a lot of them assume that all
they need to do is to buy some random stock touted by a talking head on TV and
the money will start rolling in.
This attitude is however not
specific to any age or gender, though I have seen it mostly in men. Women
either stay away from financial decisions or if they are forced to manage it,
are far more sensible as they realize their limitations.
Lack of knowledge + arrogance
+ greed/ fear is guaranteed recipe for disaster.
Knowledge risk
This is a risk a majority of
investors in india face due to the huge amount of misinformation and
misguidance by the financial services industry.
A lot of investors have been
exposed to the traditional forms of investments such as fixed deposits or gold/
real estate. They are however approached by banks/ brokers and other financial
agents from time to time on mutual funds, stocks or insurance and I have
personally found that majority of this advice is toxic (see my
post here on ULIPs).
The only way to manage this
risk is to educate yourself on the basics and never to listen blindly to your
friendly broker/ agent whose interest is in the commissions and often not your
financial well being.
Inflation/ Cost of living risk
Quite self explanatory, but a
very under-appreciated risk. A lot of people assume that if they invest in
fixed income options, they have taken care of their investment needs. My own
parents were guilty of this mistake in the past.
This risk unfortunately is a
very slow and stealthy form of risk where one thinks that his money is growing,
but in reality one is falling behind in terms of buying power. This risk comes
to bite you at absolutely the wrong time – retirement. At that time, you realize
that the nestegg is not sufficient to take care of a lot of your needs. In such
cases, in absence of a social safety net, one either has to continue working or
depends on others to make ends meet.
I see a lot of educated and
young people in my own family ignore this risk to their peril.
Leverage risk
Leverage risk is commonly
understood as the leverage taken by an investor in his portfolio. I prefer to
expand this further and consider all forms of non –investing leverage too. For
example, if you have a big home loan and other forms of leverage in the form of
personal and car loans, then your flexibility as an investor is greatly
reduced.
Lets say an individual earns
around 10 lacs per year and has around
50 lacs as various forms of loans. This individual is paying around 50% of his
earnings as debt repayment. If this individual has around 10-15 lacs as
savings, can he or she really afford to invest in a highly volatile small cap
fund ? If this was the financial profile of an individual in 2008, he or she would
have panicked and sold all their stocks
at the bottom.
I have personally looked at
leverage in the above manner and worked to ensure that my total debt to
networth never exceeds 30-40%. This ensures that my debt servicing is within
control and any fluctuations in the stock market, will not force me to
liquidate my positions to manage this debt.
Professional risk
I have never seen this risk
discussed, but I think it influences your investing behavior a lot. If you have
a full time profession (job or a business) which will put food on the table
irrespective of how the stock market behaves, it is bound to impact your risk
appetite.
A stable well paying job
allows one to take a long term view and invest without worrying about the
market volatility. On the other extreme if your monthly expenses depend
directly on the stock markets – either from capital gains or through employment
as a financial intermediary, then your risk appetite is greatly reduced.
A combination of risk
It may appear that several of
the risks I have pointed out are overlapping in nature. I would agree with that
and my post is not provide an exhaustive and non overlapping list of risks
faced by an investor. The idea is to look at some risks which
are faced by an investor, outside of the specific investment itself.
A lot of times, it is the
combination of risks which become financially fatal for an individual. Lets
say an individual does not save enough early in his or her career, and due to the
inflation risk realizes later in life that his nest egg is not going to be
sufficient. In absence of sufficient knowledge about various forms of investments,
this investor under the influence of a unscrupulous broker may make wrong
investment choices. Such an investor can get hurt very badly during a market
downturn. I think I may have described the unfortunate situation for a lot of
senior citizens.
I have tried to cover risks
which are independent of the type of instrument chosen for investing. I think
these risks play an important role in determining the nature of one’s
investments and the kind of returns one can make. In the next post, I will
discuss about the various forms business risks one needs to keep in mind when
investing in equities.
I still stand by my post below
on managing non – investing risks
http://valueinvestorindia.blogspot.com/2014/04/shortest-investment-book.html
----------------
Stocks discussed in this post are for educational purpose only and not recommendations to buy or sell. Please contact a certified investment adviser for your investment decisions. Please read disclaimer towards the end of blog.
Great post Rohit, as always. Good that you already promised next post, eagerly waiting. Please blog frequently :) it will help many.
ReplyDeleteGreat post Rohit. Your posts are always very thought provoking & inspiring. If you have not already covered topics like capital allocation, cash flow management & retirement planning from individuals point of view may I request you to do so. It would be very useful to us.
ReplyDeleteGreat post Rohit. I will expand on Professional risk by saying that roles that promote short-termism that may work against you as an investor, such as sales and trading/dealing type roles for a brokerage/investement bank/systematic quant trading fund, where focus is on intraday trading, price action vs business context. Also when you consider your portfolio as your financial assets + your human capital (potential earnings through the life of your employement career), then any correlation between the industry you work vs the stocks you own is an added risk. Lets say you have a large allocation to O&G stocks but also work for the O&G sector, you are essentially leveraged to this sector. An industry downturn results in a double whammy to your human capital(reduced bonuses, pay cuts, job loss) and your financial assets.
ReplyDeleteHi Rohit,
ReplyDeleteExcellent.If one buys any asset when everyone is buying he may not face loss in immediate future but over a period of time the capital loss is certain.....and if one buys an asset when everyone is selling he may face capital loss in immediate future but he will surely make money over long period of time........btw the new 99acres advt suggest that realestate market is turning from seller to buyers.
regards
Anurag
Excellent post. I came to this blog through a tweet but I will keep coming back for more now.
ReplyDelete